Legal Opinion

Bowen-McLaughlin-York Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 20, 1986No. 71-82CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WIESE, Judge.

I

This case involves a contract pricing dispute in which plaintiff Bowen-McLaughlin-York Company (“BMY”) seeks reformation of a fixed-price contract that it entered into with the United States Army Tank-Automotive Command (“TACOM”). The contract involved production of M88A1 tracked recovery vehicles and dieselization conversion kits for the M88 vehicle; the contract amount was $146 million. At issue are certain escalation costs on purchased materials which were omitted from the final agreed-upon contract price by oversight on BMY’s part. The amount in question, exclusive of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southwest Welding & Manufacturing Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. Board of Commissioners v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  2. National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  3. Bowen-Mclaughlin-York Company, a Division of Harsco Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API