Bowen-McLaughlin-York Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIESE, Judge.
I
This case involves a contract pricing dispute in which plaintiff Bowen-McLaughlin-York Company (“BMY”) seeks reformation of a fixed-price contract that it entered into with the United States Army Tank-Automotive Command (“TACOM”). The contract involved production of M88A1 tracked recovery vehicles and dieselization conversion kits for the M88 vehicle; the contract amount was $146 million. At issue are certain escalation costs on purchased materials which were omitted from the final agreed-upon contract price by oversight on BMY’s part. The amount in question, exclusive of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Southwest Welding & Manufacturing Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Board of Commissioners v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Bowen-Mclaughlin-York Company, a Division of Harsco Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987