Legal Opinion

Heid Bros. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 4, 1927No. F-23PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHay, Judge

The plaintiff is suing to recover the sum of $19,527.74, which it claims is due it by the United States.

*396On June 15, June 30, and July 1,1920, the plaintiff entered into four contracts with the United States whereby it agreed to furnish and deliver to the United States certain wood for use at Ellington Field, Olcott, Tex. The proposals for furnishing the fuel covered by the said contracts were required to be opened May 14, 1920, at the office of Lieutenant Colonel Dravo, who was the purchasing and contracting officer of the United States authorized to open the bids and award and execute the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Poole Engineering & Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923
  2. Lovell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
  3. Hygienic Fibre Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
  4. Snellenburg Clothing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
  5. West Leechburg Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sutcliffe Storage & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  2. Sutcliffe Storage & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  3. Board of Commissioners v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  4. American Cyanamid Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API