Legal Opinion

Wynn v. Fugate

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 2, 1931No. 21138PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

Lillie Fugate, defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, brought an action in the district court of Washington county to restrain the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, from selling certain land at a tax resale, and recovered judgment as prayed for.

The record shows that the land was a part of the surplus allotment of George Fugate, who was enrolled as a half-blood on the Cherokee rolls, and that he died seized and possessed of the same, leaving as his sole and only heirs at law his mother, the plaintiff, a full-blood, and his father, of no Indian blood;…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Choate v. TrappSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Stephens v. Cherokee NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Shaw v. Gibson-Zahniser Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ETC. v. SeberCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  2. United States v. Board of Com'rsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1939
  3. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ETC. v. SeberCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  4. Chapman v. TigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Chapman v. TigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API