Legal Opinion

United States v. Board of Com'rs

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided February 14, 1939No. Nos. 2658, 2659, 2683, 2695, 2699, 2709PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.

The United States of America, on behalf of numerous Osage Indians, has instituted six different suits, wherein the Government seeks to recover for said Indians taxes paid on real estate in Osage County, Oklahoma, for the year 1936. There are two hundred twenty nine causes of action involved in the six suits, and the total sum sought to be recovered is twenty eight thousand one hundred forty five & 80/100 dollars ($28,145.80) in taxes paid. The real estate on which the taxes were paid under protest, is land and town property, both residence and business.

In…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Choate v. TrappSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. United States v. GoldenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Helvering v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. United States v. LacherSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Hamilton v. RathboneSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ETC. v. SeberCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  2. Seber v. Board of County Com'rs of Creek CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  4. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ETC. v. SeberCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API