Legal Opinion
Chapman v. Tiger
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided August 2, 1960No. 38127Published
1Opinion of the Court
356 P.2d 571 (1960)
Earl CHAPMAN and Milton W. Hardy, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
Eliza TIGER, et al., Defendants in Error.
No. 38127.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
August 2, 1960.
Rehearing Denied November 9, 1960.
Milton W. Hardy, of Hardy & Hardy, Tulsa, Okl., for plaintiffs in error.
W.F. Semple, Tulsa, Okl., for defendants in error.
Billie W. Crain, Field Sol., D. Luster Cook, Trial Atty., Harold M. Shultz, Jr., Trial Atty., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Interior, Muskogee, Okl., amici curiae.
JACKSON, Justice.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from order of the trial court granting new trial to…
Also in this document: Dissent; Per curiam.
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Superintendent of Five Civilized Tribes v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mullen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Brader v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Parker v. RichardSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.