Legal Opinion
Lisker v. Knowles
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 10, 2006No. CV 04 02687 VAP(RZ)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
PHILLIPS, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Respondent has objected. Petitioner has not filed any written objections to the Report. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge’s-Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions. The motion to dismiss is denied, and…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bruce Lisker v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Lee v. LampertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Bennett v. FelkerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Coleman v. AllisonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Hash v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.