Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Child, Cole & Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1923No. 3817PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.

*450This appeal is on the judgment roll. The case has been in this court on two previous appeals. 41 Utah, 562, 128 Pac. 521; 47 Utah, 417, 155 Pae. 451. In 41 Utah, 562, 128 Pac. 521, it was determined that the written contract between the parties was not on its face void as being against public policy. In the second appeal (47 Utah, 417, 155 Pac. 451) the facts are stated in detail in the opinion, and the certain questions of law affecting the rights of the parties are discussed and determined. The abstract of the record on this appeal contains the amended complaint, demurrer, answer,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Mammoth Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Morgan v. Child, Cole & Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Mickelson v. New East Tintic Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Morgan v. Child, Cole & Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Kunkel v. Utah Lumber Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kirchgestner v. Denver & Rio Grande WR Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State v. WeaverUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Kirchgestner v. Denver & Rio Grande WR Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API