Legal Opinion

Kirchgestner v. Denver & Rio Grande WR Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1951No. 7370PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

This action was brought under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq. and the Safety Appliance Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 11 et seq. by the respondent, plaintiff below, to recover damages for permanent and disabling injuries allegedly sustained by him while in the performance of his duties as a brakeman for the appellant railroad company, defendant below. Ten days after the alleged mishap, the plaintiff in consideration of $135 executed a general release discharging the defendant from all liability arising out of the accident. The defendant relied upon this…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Callen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Ricketts v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. Thompson v. CampCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  4. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
  5. Graham v. Atchison. T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Ruggles v. SelbyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  3. Gleason v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. Bachran v. MorishigeHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Bracy v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API