Legal Opinion

Ure v. Ure

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1900PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

The chancellor entered the decree here appealed from on the theory the trust created by the second clause of the will of Margaret Ure, deceased, was a passive or dry trust, and that the Statute of Uses instantly operated to vest the legal title to the real estate in the cestui que trust. Whether such is the true construction of the clause is the only question presented by the record. The clause reads as follows:

“Second—After the payment of such funeral expenses and debts, I give, devise and bequeath to my son John Francis Ure all my cows, bulls and calves, except one cow and my horses Rosy,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meacham v. SteeleIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Wheeler v. County of WayneIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Youngworth v. JewellNevada Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Newark Shoe Stores Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Ure v. UreIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  3. People v. BullockAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  4. McCoy v. HouckIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. City of Orlando v. EvansSupreme Court of Florida · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API