Legal Opinion
Anderson v. American Family Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided November 26, 2002No. 02-0980PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOVER, PJ.
¶ 1. Mark and Janet Anderson appeal a summary judgment finding that Mary Anne Brasure and her son Gregory Brasure are immune from civil liability under Wis. Stat. § 125.035 1 for providing the Andersons' underage son, Craig, with alcohol. The Andersons also appeal the portion of the judgment that found Gregory was not covered by his father's insurance policy issued by American Family Mutual Insur- anee Company. While we agree with the trial court that Gregory was immune from suit and not covered by the insurance policy, Mary Anne is not immune from suit. Thus, we affirm the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Lambrecht v. Estate of KaczmarczykWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Stephenson v. Universal Metrics, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Ledman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- Kwiatkowski v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marshall Schinner v. Michael GundrumWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Anderson v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Marshall Schinner v. Michael GundrumWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013