Legal Opinion

Kwiatkowski v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 22, 1990No. 90-0878-FTPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, P.J.

Raymond Kwiatkowski, Jr. (Raymond) and his parents appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint for failure to state a claim for relief. The issue is whether the Kwiatkowskis' action is precluded in spite of sec. 125.035(4)(b), Stats., which under limited circumstances lifts the statute's general grant of immunity to providers of alcohol beverages. We conclude that the immunity exception does not apply. We therefore affirm the judgment dismissing the complaint.

We take the relevant facts from the Kwiatkowskis' complaint, which must be accepted as true. Sorensen v. Jarvis, 119 Wis. 2d 627,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sorensen v. JarvisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Garcia v. HargroveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Koback v. CrookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. GomazWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Seibel v. LeachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. Corey J.G.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Delos Reyes v. KuboyamaHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Doering v. WEA Ins. GroupWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Miller v. ThomackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. PaulickCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API