Spikener v. Ally Financial, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 6/9/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE DAMON SPIKENER, Plaintiff and Appellant, A157301 v. ALLY FINANCIAL, INC., (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. HG18893481) Defendant and Respondent. Title 16, section 433.2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (the Holder Rule), promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), requires consumer credit contracts to include the following notice: “ANY HOLDER OF THIS CONSUMER CREDIT CONTRACT IS SUBJECT TO ALL CLAIMS AND DEFENSES WHICH THE DEBTOR COULD ASSERT AGAINST THE SELLER…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kisor v. WilkieSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- City of Arlington v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Olszewski v. Scripps HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Viva! International Voice for Animals v. Adidas Promotional Retail Operations, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Paduano v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.