Legal Opinion

State v. Simon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 10, 1983No. C1-83-751PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

In State v. Nordstrom, 331 N.W.2d 901 (Minn.1983), we held in part that a prior misdemeanor DWI conviction based on an uncounseled guilty plea cannot be used to convert a subsequent DWI offense into a gross misdemeanor under Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 3 (1982), absent a valid waiver of counsel on the record of the prior proceeding. In Nordstrom there was no record and the guilty plea was uncoun-seled. 1 Our decision was based on Baldasar v. Illinois, 446 U.S. 222, 100 S.Ct. 1585, 64 L.Ed.2d 169 (1980), a case that forbade use of a prior uncounseled misdemeanor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. State v. MotlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Shackelford v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. State v. LangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. In Re the Welfare of T.S.E.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. FussyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API