State v. Simon
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
In State v. Nordstrom, 331 N.W.2d 901 (Minn.1983), we held in part that a prior misdemeanor DWI conviction based on an uncounseled guilty plea cannot be used to convert a subsequent DWI offense into a gross misdemeanor under Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 3 (1982), absent a valid waiver of counsel on the record of the prior proceeding. In Nordstrom there was no record and the guilty plea was uncoun-seled. 1 Our decision was based on Baldasar v. Illinois, 446 U.S. 222, 100 S.Ct. 1585, 64 L.Ed.2d 169 (1980), a case that forbade use of a prior uncounseled misdemeanor…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. MotlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Shackelford v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. LangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- In Re the Welfare of T.S.E.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. FussyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.