St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. State
New York Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gerard M. Weisberg, J.
The defendants (hereinafter collectively referred to as "State”) have moved to dismiss this claim, contending that it fails to state a cause of action (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 7), that the Court of Claims lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 2), and that the claim is untimely (Court of Claims Act, § 10, subd 4). Claimant has cross-moved for summary judgment and for permission to file a late claim (CPLR 3212; Court of Claims Act, § 10, subd 6).
The claim is predicated upon article 3-A of the Lien Law *143which…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Andre v. PomeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Duncan Townsite Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- City of New York v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- S.J. Groves & Sons Co. v. Peters (In Re Peters)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1988
- Sarbro IX v. State New York Office of General ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Taylor v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1994
- 405 Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1983
- Rye Psychiatric Hospital Center, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.