Legal Opinion

O'Herron v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 14, 1964No. 20142Published

1Opinion of the Court

397 P.2d 227 (1964)

Elizabeth O'HERRON, Dallas Leroy Dixon and Magdelena Hendrix, Plaintiffs in Error,

v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Defendant in Error.

No. 20142.

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc.

December 14, 1964.

Williams & Zook, John G. Taussig, Jr., Roger E. Stevens, William A. Trine, Boulder, for plaintiffs in error.

A. Joseph Williams, Boulder, for defendant in error.

FRANTZ, Justice.

The propriety of the entry of a summary judgment is questioned by this writ of error. It was entered in favor of third party defendant and counterclaimant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Empire Electronics Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Trinity Universal Insurance v. WillrichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Elmer L. Caylor v. C. Edgar VirdenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
  4. O'Herron v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  5. Robert N. Cameron and Jack Crawford v. Vancouver Plywood CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API