Legal Opinion
O'Herron v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided December 14, 1964No. 20142PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frantz
The propriety of the entry of a summary judgment is questioned by this writ of error. It was entered in favor of third party defendant and counterclaimant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it is contractually exempt from liability on its policies of insurance issued to Dallas Leroy Dixon and Magdelena Hendrix.
*166Elizabeth O’Herron, a pedestrian, had been struck by a Hudson automobile driven by Dixon but owned by Mendal Edwards, the operator of a garage in Boulder, Colorado. Mrs. Hendrix is the mother of Dixon, a 16-year-old boy, and they…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Empire Electronics Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Trinity Universal Insurance v. WillrichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Elmer L. Caylor v. C. Edgar VirdenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- Robert N. Cameron and Jack Crawford v. Vancouver Plywood CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance v. SkluzacekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Austin v. LitvakSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Ginter v. Palmer & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado v. SharpSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Mt. Emmons Mining Co. v. Town of Crested ButteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. District Court for the Fourth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.