Legal Opinion
McConnell Auto. Corp. v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 1, 2002No. 1010006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
849 So.2d 159 (2002)
McCONNELL AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION et al.
v.
Robert JACKSON and Kisha Jackson.
1010006.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
November 1, 2002.
Michael P. Windom of Windom & Tobias, L.L.C., Mobile, for appellants.
John Ronald Spencer, Mobile, for appellees.
MADDOX, Retired Justice.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in refusing to compel arbitration in this case on the basis that the underlying transaction did not have a substantial effect on interstate commerce. The plaintiffs, Robert Jackson and Kisha Jackson, claimed that the defendants, McConnell…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. LarkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Steele v. WalserSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Steele v. WalserSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003