Legal Opinion
Horvath v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 20, 2018No. 2017-1801PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dyk, Circuit Judge.
Michael Horvath brought this putative class-action lawsuit in the Court of Federal Claims ("Claims Court") seeking overtime and related compensation on behalf of himself and similarly situated special agents of the U.S. Secret Service. Among his theories of recovery, Mr. Horvath asserted that regulations promulgated by the Office of Personnel Management ("OPM") improperly required that certain overtime hours be worked consecutively in order to trigger compensation. See 5 C.F.R. §§ 550.111 (f)(2)(ii), 550.182(b)(2). Because we find that those challenged regulations are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. ClineSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- John Doe, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Res-Care, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Acala v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Acala v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Anoruo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Haggar v. McDonoughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Horvath v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.