Legal Opinion

State v. Sabbot

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 16, 1977No. 1949-2PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hale, J. *

It is bad business to sell contraband drugs, and a foolish one as well, to make delivery inside one’s dwelling house. The point at issue, however, is not whether the buyer who took delivery in the seller’s house was a business invitee, licensee, social guest, or trespasser. Rather, it is whether the illegal delivery of drugs to a police agent who followed the seller into his house without either an invitation or a refusal of admittance made an unlawful seizure when the drugs were handed him.

Defendant Ronald Sabbot lived in Raymond, Pacific County. He had a friend named Ralph…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. State v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FlippoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. RainesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  3. State v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  4. State v. CyrusCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. State v. WallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API