Legal Opinion
State v. Raines
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 18, 1989No. 21619-8-IPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals September 18, 1989.]
Scholfield, J.
David Raines appeals his convictions on two counts of violating the Uniform Controlled Substances Act. Raines claims that the convictions were based on illegally seized evidence. We affirm Raines' conviction on count 1 and reverse his conviction on count 3. The State properly concedes error regarding admission of evidence supporting the third count pursuant to State v. Boyce, 52 Wn. App. 274, 758 P.2d 1017 (1988). We therefore address only admissibility of evidence supporting the first count.
On July 20, 1987, at…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. StroudWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. ChrismanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Maureen Tierney, for Herself and as Mother of Philip T. Newton, Patrick J. Newton v. Joel R. Davidson Thomas E. Williams, State of VermontCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Hsien I. Peng v. Mei Chin Penghu Jonathan Hu S. Gage, Los Angeles County Deputy, Badge No. 406857, Sued IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- State v. Bustamante-DavilaWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. Bustamante-DavilaWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MenzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.