Hamilton v. Mid-West Abrasive Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WILLSON, District Judge.
This is an action by plaintiff, Alfred E. Hamilton, for money damages and in-junctive relief against the defendant, Mid-West Abrasive Company, for infringement of plaintiff’s United States Letters Patent No. 2,442,042, issued May 25, 1948. This Hamilton patent covers a grinding apparatus used in the stainless steel industry to grind away scales and surface defects on stainless steel slabs or billets at an intermediate point of production. Plaintiff contends that defendant’s slab grinding machines and its billet grinding machine infringe on plaintiff’s claim 7, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Packwood v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Chemical Construction Corporation v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, Chemical Construction Corporation v. Jones & Laughlin Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Pierce v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Berwick Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
- Allen-Bradley Company v. Air Reduction CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Briggs v. Wix CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
- Olympia Werke Aktiengesellschaft v. General Electric Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1979