Legal Opinion
Briggs v. Wix Corporation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 25, 1969No. Civ. A. 65-C-1307, 65-C-1308, 65-C-1683-65-C-1685PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, MEMORANDUM, ORDER AND JUDGMENT.
CAMPBELL, Chief Judge.
This is a patent infringement action. Plaintiffs originally filed six separate actions against the named defendants 1 accusing each of them with infringement of claims Nos. ’9, 10 and 11 of patent No. 2,395,449. (Hereinafter referred to as ’449), which was originally issued to plaintiff S.outhwick W. Briggs (“Briggs”) on February 26, 1946. One of the original six cases has since been settled. (Briggs v. Gould-National Batteries, Inc., 65-C-2073). The patent in issue expired on February 26, 1963. After…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Dunlap v. SchofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Conwed Corporation v. NORTENE, SADistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1975
- Technitrol, Inc. v. Memorex CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
- Smith v. GehringCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation (No. II)District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1984
- Catanzaro v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.