Legal Opinion

People v. Moreno

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1991No. F011019PublishedCited by 8 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THAXTER, J.

In what is apparently a case of first impression, we will hold that the special circumstances jury trial provision of Penal Code 1 section 190.4, subdivision (a) is not mandated by the California Constitution.

Statement of the Case

In information number 25143 Fermín Fredric Moreno and his brother, Fernando Moreno (collectively appellants), were charged with the murder of Henry Woods (§ 187), special circumstances (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)), attempted robbery (§§ 211, 664), and burglary (§ 459). Personal use of a deadly weapon (knife) enhancements (§ 12022, subd. (b)) were…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. VeraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. WrestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. SivongxxayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  5. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API