Brown v. Michelin North America, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMain, Justice
(dissenting in case no. 1121330 and concurring in part and dissenting in part in case no. 1121341).
In case no. 1121330, I must respectfully dissent. In case no. 1121341, I concur in part and dissent in part.
I do not believe mandamus relief is proper in the context of most discovery matters. This Court has recognized four circumstances in which a discovery order may be reviewed by a petition for a writ of mandamus. See Ex parte Ocwen Fed. Bank, FSB, 872 So.2d 810, 813 (Ala.2003); see also Ex parte Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc., 879 So.2d 1134, 1137 (Ala.2003) (citing Ocwen). Those circumstances…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Ex Parte Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte Compass BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Home Ins. Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Ex Parte Dillard Dep't Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.