Legal Opinion

Home Ins. Co. v. Rice

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 2, 1991No. 1900437PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Home Insurance Company ("The Home") appeals from the entry of a partial summary judgment, made final pursuant to Rule 54(b), Ala.R.Civ.P., in favor of its insured, Arthur M. Rice, in Rice's action against The Home to compel it to defend him in two lawsuits1 filed against him.

The Home issued to Rice a "claims made" errors and omissions insurance policy that The Home contends covered only Rice's actions as a real estate agent or broker. This policy was in effect from October 9, 1984, through October 9, 1985. Actions were filed against Rice by Ernest Ross and George Miller on February 7,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Scott v. Dreamlite Holdings Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Ladner Co., Inc. v. Southern Guaranty Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Ross v. Bank South, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  4. General Tire Co. of Minneapolis v. Standard Acc. Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  5. Burnham Shoes, Inc. v. West American Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Ex Parte Miltope CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Ex Parte ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Guaranty National Insurance v. Beeline Stores, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
  5. Zaden v. ElkusSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API