Legal Opinion

United States v. Sparrow

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 12, 1991No. 65,743; CM 8802247PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

Tried by general court-martial, the accused was convicted, despite his pleas, of forcible sodomy of a child under the age of 16 years1 and false swearing, in violation of Articles 125 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 925 and 934, respectively. The adjudged and approved sentence extends to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 4 years, and total forfeitures. Finding that defense counsel did not have an opportunity to comment on “new matter” contained in the recommendation of the staff judge advocate, the Court of Military Review ordered a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. FowleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  3. United States v. LeviteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. GradyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. United States v. SchomakerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  3. United States v. SchnitzerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  4. United States v. GonzalezU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
  5. United States v. GonzalezU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API