Legal Opinion

CARAMANZANA

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1967No. 1688PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #1688 IVIATITS OF OARAMANZANA In Visa. Petition Proceedings A-14214539 Decided by Board February 0, 1967 Visa petition by a United States citizen to accord beneficiary, his adopted daughter, preference status as an "unmarried daughter" under the provisions of section 203(a) (1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended by P.L. 89-238, is denied since the adoption, which occurred when beneficial' , was over 21 years ve age, was not in compliance with the provisions Or section 101(b) (1) (E) of the Act, as amended, as required for immigration purposes. ON BEHALF or…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vicente Villamosa Nazareno v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  2. CARIAGABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1976
  3. Nazareno v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  4. YUENBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1972
  5. BUTTERLYBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API