Legal Opinion
Nazareno v. Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 20, 1973No. Civ. A. No. 970-73PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WILLIAM B. JONES, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Fe Nazareno and Enrique Templora Targa are both 32 year old unmarried aliens, who were legally adopted pursuant to judicial decrees of the States of Maryland and California in 1970 and 1972. Petitions were filed on their behalf by their adoptive parents under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1153, 1154, to classify them as a daughter and a son respectively under the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended (Act). These petitions were denied on the ground that, since the petitioners were not adopted until they were 30 and 32 years of age,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Navinchandra Mafatlal Jarecha v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Rosenberg v. Yee Chien WooSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chinese American Civic Council v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Ishak v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
- Chinese American Civic Council v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Ishak v. DIST. DIR., IMM. AND NAT. SERVICE, ETC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977