Legal Opinion
United States v. Russell Harold Smith
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 11, 1972No. 71-1321PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEBSTER, District Judge.
In a ease tried to the court without a jury appellant was found guilty of refusing to submit to induction into the armed forces, in violation of Title 50, Appendix, United States Code, Section 462.
In his unreported Memorandum and Finding of Guilty, Judge Larson accurately summarized the material facts as follows:
“The defendant was first ordered on September 16, 1969, to report for induction on October 2, 1969. Defendant on October 1, 1969, asked for transfer to a Local Board in Alaska. Defendant appears to have returned to Minnesota and on January 5, 1970, was ordered…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Cox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Leon Herbert Greer, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Sheri Lee McCradyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Wythers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977