Legal Opinion

Baker v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 1, 1931No. 13216PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

The respondent, Mrs. Esther Baker, is the mother of Edward Baker, who is a deaf mute of about eight years at the times with which this action is concerned. In September, 1929, she, as guardian ad litem of Edward Baker, brought this action, the object of which is to recover damages which it is alleged the infant Edward Baker suffered through the negligent, willful, and wanton acts of the defendants the Southern Cotton Oil Company and Jack Aldridge, its servant and employee, under the circumstances set out in the complaint. Only the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  2. Fox v. Peninsular White Lead & Color WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Marshall v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Huffman v. . ClickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  5. Edwards v. Union Buffalo Mills Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baker Ex Rel. Estate of Baker v. Port City Steel Erectors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  2. La Count v. General Asbestos & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  3. Baker Ex Rel. Estate of Baker v. Port City Steel Erectors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API