Legal Opinion

Huffman v. . Click

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1877PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Civil Action for Damages tried at Spring Term, 1877,. -of Row AN Superior Court, before KeRR, J. It appeared that there was .a difficulty between the plaintiff and the defendant, Click, in regard to an injury to a valuable hog of the defendant, alleged to have been received while the hog was in a field cultivated by plaintiff. Click .and the other defendants went to the plaintiff's house and ..demanded pay for the hog.

Read the full summary

Civil Action for Damages tried at Spring Term, 1877,. -of Row AN Superior Court, before KeRR, J. It appeared that there was .a difficulty between the plaintiff and the defendant, Click, in regard to an injury to a valuable hog of the defendant, alleged to have been received while the hog was in a field cultivated by plaintiff. Click .and the other defendants went to the plaintiff's house and ..demanded pay for the hog. Upon that occasion it was alleged that their manner and conduct so greatly frightened the plaintiff as to cause paralysis from which she suffered ■for three months. There was…

1Opinion of the CourtBynum, J.

The defendants ’say that the plaintiff was subject to hysteria which is an exciting cause of paralysis and in this case produced it without any default of theirs. To show' this, they introduced a witness who testified to certain “mad-fits ” and crying spells of the plaintiff several years prior to-the attack of paralysis. They then introduced a physician-who testified that he had heard all the evidence and from it was of opinion that the plaintiff was subject to hysteria,- and that this disease was an exciting cause of paralysis. Healso testified that “Hammond’s Work on the Diseases of the*…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Ripon v. BittelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cashwell v. Fayetteville Pepsi-Cola Bottling WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. Horah v. . KnoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. City of Bloomington v. ShrockIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Boyle v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Lynch v. Rosemary Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API