Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Brown

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1883PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Error to Kent. (Montgomery, J.) Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This case comes before us for the second time ; the first verdict having been set aside on exceptions and a new trial ordered. See 47 Mich. 576. On the second trial the plaintiff again recovered.

The action is for a negligent injury. The defendant is a druggist of the city of Grand Eapids. The plaintiff called for Epsom salts at his store and a clerk delivered instead sulphate of zinc, from the taking of which, before she discovered the error, the plaintiff claims to have been seriously and permanently injured.

To show the effects of sulphate of zinc on the system experts were called, but they…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Brown v. MarshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Pinney v. CahillMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. De Haan v. WinterMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. People v. MillardMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Fox v. Peninsular White Lead & Color WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. City of Bloomington v. ShrockIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Hall v. MurdockMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API