Legal Opinion
United States v. Padilla-Pena
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 6, 1997No. 97-1297, 97-1299, 97-1313, 97-1316, 97-1320, 97-1321 and 97-1323PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
Luis Padilla-Pena, Francisco Padilla-Pena, Ana Rosa Padilla-Pena, Angelica Padilla-Pena, Roberto Guzzman, Michael Padilla-Pena, and Artemio Esparza appeal their convictions of conspiracy to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1997), varying counts of possession with intent to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1997), and the sentences imposed upon them. 1 All appeal their convictions, arguing that the district court 2 erred in denying their motions to dismiss or to suppress the wiretap, and Michael Padilla-Pena and Roberto…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. DavidCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- United States v. CharlesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- United States v. David Joseph MickelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. James F. AtkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States of America,appellee v. Euka Wadlington,appellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Reynaldo F. AlverezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.