Legal Opinion

Bark v. Northrop

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided February 23, 2014No. Case No. 3:13-cv-00828-AAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

AIKEN, Chief Judge:

Plaintiffs Bark, et al. filed suit alleging that federal defendants Lisa Northrop, et al. violated the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) and the National Forest Management Act (“NFMA”), Federal defendants and defendant-intervenor RLK and Company (“RLK”) move under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c) for a protective order (1) limiting the review of plaintiffs’ claims to the administrative record in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., and (2) precluding plaintiffs’ discovery requests, including plaintiffs’ recent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Sierra Club v. United States Department of EnergyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bark v. NorthropDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
  2. Carlos Vasquez v. Estee Lauder Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2023
  3. Maddern v. AustinDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
  4. Northwest Environmental Advocates v. United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API