Legal Opinion

Maddern v. Austin

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 28, 2022No. 3:21-cv-01298Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 21cv1298-MMA (BLM) 11 RONALD MADDERN, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY 13 v. [ECF NO. 9] 14 LLOYD AUSTIN in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of 15 Defense, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s December 29, 2021 Motion for Discovery [ECF No. 20 9 (“Mot.”)], Defendant’s January 10, 2022 opposition to the motion [ECF No. 14 (“Oppo”)], and 21 Plaintiff’s January 14, 2022 reply [ECF No. 17-1 (“Reply”)]. For the reasons set…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Department of Commerce v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Willie Goffney, Jr. v. Xavier BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  4. Zevallos v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. Greene v. BabbittDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API