Legal Opinion
Harrigan v. Yang
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 12, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-0511PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Clare Harrigan is a lawyer who, since 2007, has been administratively litigating claims of discrimination and retaliation against her former employer, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In this lawsuit, Plaintiff does not sue HUD; instead, she has sued Defendant Jenny Yang, in her capacity as the Chairwoman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), and the EEOC itself. According to Plaintiff, the EEOC acted unlawfully with respect to its review and processing of her various discrimination…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Coulibaly v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Alavi v. ShellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Travis v. PerdueDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2021
- Young v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018