Legal Opinion

Smith v. Royal Ins.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 1, 1941No. 19382-RPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ROCHE, District Judge.

Plaintiff, former holder of a month-to-month tenancy on an estate at Belvedere, California, seeks to recover $15,000 from defendant on a valued fire insurance policy. This case, submitted to the court at the conclusion of the third trial (see Smith v. Royal Insurance Company, D.C., 5 F.Supp. 435; Royal Ins. Co. v. Smith, 9 Cir., 77 F.2d 157; Smith v. Royal Ins. Co., 9 Cir., 93 F.2d 143; Id., D.C., 26 F.Supp. 238; Id., 9 Cir., 111 F.2d 667, 130 A.L.R. 812), presents certain affirmative defenses for the first time. In the last hearing before the Circuit Court, the question…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Telford v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. California-Western States Life Insurance v. FeinstenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Smith v. Royal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  4. Smith v. Royal Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  5. Royal Ins. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API