Fike v. Newlin
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.
This is a suit by the appellees, Newlin and Black, to obtain compensation for their services in finding a purchaser for a tourist court owned bj^ the appellant and her husband. The principal defense is that the appellees failed to produce a buyer willing to take the property on terms acceptable to the Fikes. The trial court, sitting without a jury, entered judgment for the appellees for $1,500.
In 1953 Mr. a'nd Mrs. Fike listed their property with Newlin and Black, licensed dealers in real estate. Late in July the Fikes were taken by the appellees to Bolivar, Missouri, to inspect a business…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dillinger v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Bennett v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Boyles v. KnoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Carnahan v. Lyman Real Estate CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- El Dorado Real Estate Co. v. GarrettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Walthour v. FinleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Sarna v. FairweatherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- O'Glee v. TriggDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1967
- Whitefield v. HaggartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.