Legal Opinion

Boyles v. Knox

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 7, 1947No. 4-8115PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Minor W. Mill wee, Justice.

This is an action by appellee, Howard Knox, against appellants, James Boyles and wife, to recover a real estate broker’s commission alleged to be due appellee for his services in finding a purchaser for appellants’ tourist court located in Harrison, Arkansas.

Appellants listed the property with appellee and Tom Brown, another broker, jointly, in July, 1945, with the understanding that the two brokers would share a 5% commission equally if a buyer were found by either of them. Appellants placed a price of $24,000 on the property and agreed to extend credit for a part…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moore v. IrwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Branch v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  3. Reeder v. EppsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  4. Poston v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Dillinger v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fike v. NewlinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. El Dorado Real Estate Co. v. GarrettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  3. O'Glee v. TriggDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1967
  4. Canute v. BurnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  5. Holland v. DietzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API