Legal Opinion

Scheidt v. Teakwood Cabinet & Fixture, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 2, 2009No. 100,988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

Had the Kansas Supreme Court’s opinion in Casco v. Armour Swift-Eckrich, 283 Kan. 508, 154 P.3d 494 (2007), been applied to Robert Scheidt’s 2002 settlement award with his employer, Teakwood Cabinet and Fixture, his injury to both arms would have been a scheduled injury rather than the 22.5% whole-body, permanent partial general disability that the parties agreed upon in their settlement. But Casco was decided well after Scheidt’s award became final, and the award was left open for coverage of further medical treatment and possible modification. One modification available under…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Casco v. Armour Swift-EckrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Graham v. Dokter Trucking GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Honn v. ElliottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Peterson v. Garvey Elevators, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Medina v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Fire Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  2. Hughes v. City of HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  3. Medina v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF POLICE & FIRECourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API