Legal Opinion

Jurva v. Attorney General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1984No. 68500, (Calendar No. 16)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.

The issues raised in this appeal are whether the Board of Education of the Rochester Community Schools has the authority to provide for early retirement incentive payments in its collective-bargaining agreement with the Rochester Education Association, and whether early retirement incentives are contrary to the Michigan constitutional mandate that the financial benefits of a pension plan or retirement system be funded during the fiscal year in which the services upon which the benefits are based are performed. Const 1963, art 9, § 24.

I. Facts

Plaintiff Rochester Education Association is the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Fair Lawn Education Ass'n v. Fair Lawn Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Sebewaing Industries, Inc. v. Village of SebewaingMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Kosa v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Bowler v. NagelMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Musselman v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Shelby Township Police & Fire Retirement Board v. Shelby TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Slocum v. Holton Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Studier v. Michigan Public School Employees' Retirement BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Wayne County Employees Retirement System v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API