Legal Opinion

Shelby Township Police & Fire Retirement Board v. Shelby Township

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1991No. Docket 86109; Calendar 1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallett, J.

We granted leave to determine (1) whether the township’s annual pension fund contribution mandated by Const 1963, art 9, § 24 must include current service costs and unfunded accrued liabilities, (2) whether the township’s annual contribution to the retirement system may be determined by the retirement board’s hired actuary in accordance with 1937 PA 345, and (3) whether the trial court erred in not issuing a writ of mandamus requiring the township to comply with the retirement board’s certified recommendation.

We find that Const 1963, art 9, § 24 expressly requires the township to maintain the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dearborn Fire Fighters Union Local No 412 v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority v. Boards of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Kosa v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Smith v. School District No. 6Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 258Michigan Supreme Court · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kinder Morgan Michigan, LLC v. City of JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. AFT Michigan v. MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. In re City of DetroitUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  4. People v. YoungMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Pontiac Police & Fire Retiree Prefunded Group Health & Insurance Trust Board of Trustees v. City of Pontiac No 1Michigan Court of Appeals · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API