Legal Opinion

Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. Goodwin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 15, 1915No. 786. [fn†]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This suit was prosecuted by the appellee Goodwin against the Texas Building Company and the Quanah, Acme Pacific Railway Company, for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of being thrown from his horse, which was frightened at a street crossing on appellant company's railway, by the obstruction of the crossing in piling steel rails in the street, etc. The railway company answered by denials of negligence on its part, and also alleged that it had contracted with the Southwestern Construction Company to build an extension of its road 40 miles from Paducah, in a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Shippers Compress & Warehouse Co. v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. CroskellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  4. Nabours v. McCordTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Dublin v. Taylor, Bastrop & Houston Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. MBank of El Paso, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1990
  2. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. GoberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. GoberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Sulzberger & Sons Co. of America v. PageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API