Legal Opinion

Nabours v. McCord

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1904No. 1270PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Certificate of dissent from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District, on error from Milam County.

1Opinion of the Court

BBOWbr, Associate Justice.

Certified question from the Court of Civil Appeals of the Third Supreme Judicial District, as follows:

“The plaintiffs in error, Uabours and others, brought this suit for their own use, and for the use of all other accepting creditors of W. F. and E. M. Crawford under a deed of assignment made to defendants, McCord and Henderson, as assignees, naming as defendants the assignees and their bondsmen and the Milam County Oil Mill Company. At the trial the plaintiffs dismissed their suit as against the defendants Henderson and the bondsmen, and upon the verdict of a jury…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tenison v. PattonTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Howards v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Cook v. Berlin Woolen Mill Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Davoue v. FanningNew York Court of Chancery · 1816
  5. Connolly v. HammondTexas Supreme Court · 1879

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Crenshaw v. SwensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Schiller v. ElickTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Zorn v. BrooksTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Nabours v. McCordTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Taber v. Dallas CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1908

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API