Legal Opinion

Kurtz v. Kurtz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 13, 1956No. Gen. 46,767PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion on Rehearing.

JUDGE FEHSFBERG

delivered the opinion of the court.

We granted defendant a rehearing in order to give further consideration to the question as to whether a partnership existed between plaintiff and defendant in the meat market business conducted by him.

Plaintiff filed her complaint in equity, seeking a decree finding her to be entitled to an undivided one-half interest in the meat market business operated and controlled by defendant, and for an accounting with respect thereto. An answer was filed, and upon a hearing before the chancellor a decree was entered dismissing…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Winger v. Chicago City Bank & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Rizzo v. RizzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Fougner v. First National Bank of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Einsweiler v. EinsweilerIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Mauricau v. HaugenIllinois Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peck v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Englestein v. MacKieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  3. Laroia v. ReubenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. In Re SeabloomUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 1987
  5. Sri Corp. v. First Nat'l Bk. of Rock IslandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API