Legal Opinion

State v. Cach

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 28, 2001No. 9903-61470; CA A105887Published

1Opinion of the Court

19 P.3d 992 (2001)

172 Or. App. 745

In the Matter of Jeffrey Cach, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,

v.

Jeffrey CACH, Appellant.

(9903-61470; CA A105887)

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted January 7, 2000.

Decided February 28, 2001.

Thomas A. Coleman, Portland, submitted the brief for appellant.

Michael C. Livingston, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.

KISTLER, J.

The…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. BaroneOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. MayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. State v. BuffumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API