City of Lake Elmo v. Metropolitan Council
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
This appeal arises out of the City of Lake Elmo’s challenge to the Metropolitan Council’s (“Council”) final decision, Resolution 2003-10, which requires Lake Elmo to conform its comprehensive land use plan (“comprehensive plan”) to the Council’s regional system plans (“system plans”). See Metropolitan Council Res.2003-10 (April 7, 2003) (hereinafter “Resolution 2003-10”). The City of Lake Elmo argues that the Council does not have the statutory authority to adopt Resolution 2003-10 and, therefore, the resolution is not binding upon it. The court of appeals affirmed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Netzer v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- City of Brooklyn Center v. Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- City of Lake Elmo v. Metropolitan CouncilCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Christie v. EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- In re Source Code Evidentiary Hearings in Implied Consent MattersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Concept Properties, LLP v. City of MinnetristaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.