Legal Opinion

City of Lake Elmo v. Metropolitan Council

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 5, 2004No. A03-458PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLATZ, Chief Justice.

This appeal arises out of the City of Lake Elmo’s challenge to the Metropolitan Council’s (“Council”) final decision, Resolution 2003-10, which requires Lake Elmo to conform its comprehensive land use plan (“comprehensive plan”) to the Council’s regional system plans (“system plans”). See Metropolitan Council Res.2003-10 (April 7, 2003) (hereinafter “Resolution 2003-10”). The City of Lake Elmo argues that the Council does not have the statutory authority to adopt Resolution 2003-10 and, therefore, the resolution is not binding upon it. The court of appeals affirmed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Netzer v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. City of Brooklyn Center v. Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. City of Lake Elmo v. Metropolitan CouncilCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Christie v. EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  3. In re Source Code Evidentiary Hearings in Implied Consent MattersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Concept Properties, LLP v. City of MinnetristaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  5. Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API