City of Lake Elmo v. Metropolitan Council
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHUMAKER, Judge.
Appellant City of Lake Elmo appeals from respondent Metropolitan Council’s adoption of the resolution requiring Lake Elmo to modify its proposed 1998 Comprehensive Plan Amendment. An administrative law judge reviewed this matter and recommended that the Metropolitan Council (the council) adopt the resolution because Lake Elmo’s plan has a substantial impact on or contains a substantial departure from metropolitan system plans. Thus, the council was authorized to require modifications of Lake Elmo’s plan. Because there is a preponderance of evidence in the record to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Quinn Distributing Company v. Quast Transfer, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Lake Elmo v. Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004