Smith v. Kingsley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Maxey,
This is an action of ejectment by the heirs of a tenant in common and the claim is for a one-quarter undivided interest in the coal underlying a certain area in the Borough of Blakely, Lackawanna County, containing 122 acres. The case was tried by the court below without a jury and the decision was in favor of the defendants. This appeal followed.
Edward London died intestate in 1815, the owner of a tract of land, including the land in controversy, leaving to survive him four children. Two of these children were Isaac London and Susan London Dolph. The present…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Osterling v. FrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Neely v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Law v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
- Phillips v. GreggSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- London v. KingsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Hepps v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Conneaut Lake Park, Inc. v. KlingensmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Schlein v. GrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Bezjak, J. v. Diamond, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.