Legal Opinion

Smith v. Kingsley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1938No. Appeal, 174PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Maxey,

This is an action of ejectment by the heirs of a tenant in common and the claim is for a one-quarter undivided interest in the coal underlying a certain area in the Borough of Blakely, Lackawanna County, containing 122 acres. The case was tried by the court below without a jury and the decision was in favor of the defendants. This appeal followed.

Edward London died intestate in 1815, the owner of a tract of land, including the land in controversy, leaving to survive him four children. Two of these children were Isaac London and Susan London Dolph. The present…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Osterling v. FrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Neely v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Law v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  5. Phillips v. GreggSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. London v. KingsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Hepps v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Conneaut Lake Park, Inc. v. KlingensmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Schlein v. GrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Bezjak, J. v. Diamond, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API