Legal Opinion

Hepps v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1984No. 18 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1983PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

The instant civil libel action resulted from a series of five “investigative” articles appearing in The Philadelphia Inquirer which purported to link Maurice S. Hepps, General Programming, Inc. and a number of independent corporate entities who operated beer and beverage distributorships as franchises of General Programming, Inc. to certain named “underworld” figures and to organized crime generally. Maurice Hepps, the individual plaintiff-appellant was the principle stockholder of the corporate plaintiff-appellant, General Programming, Inc. (“General”). General owns…

2Cases cited113 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. HeppsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Tucker v. Philadelphia Daily NewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Banas v. Matthews International Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. American Future Systems, Inc. v. Better Business BureauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Geyer v. SteinbronnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API